“WASHINGTON (CNN) -- You've seen the iconic picture of a soldier with a cigarette dangling from his mouth, but that could soon be a thing of the past.
A new study commissioned by the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs recommends a complete ban on tobacco, which would end tobacco sales on military bases and prohibit smoking by anyone in uniform, not even combat troops in the thick of battle.
According to the study, tobacco use impairs military readiness in the short term. Over the long term, it can cause serious health problems, including lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. The study also says smokeless tobacco use can lead to oral and pancreatic cancer.
The Defense Department's top health officials are studying the report's suggestions and will make recommendations to the Pentagon's policy team and Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
The study recommends phasing out tobacco products such as cigarettes and cigars over a five- to 10-year period…”
The CNN story goes on to say that many in the military object to a ban on smoking.
The military is so upset with the idea of gays in the military, and we know that about 10% of the military is gay, I think we should offer a deal …It could be you can smoke if you agree to gays in the military. Smile
Continue reading "Smoking or gays?" »
Story Highlights Plainclothes investigators test security at 10 federal buildings in 4 U.S. cities GAO agents able to assemble components in restrooms, freely enter offices GAO's report questions effectiveness of the Federal Protective Service Sen. Susan Collins: Security lapses show "poor training, lax management" at FPS You can read the CNN story but I just got to put in my two-cents on the subject. At one time federal buildings were guarded by private contract guards from services like Pinkerton, Burns and others.
The contract company would bid on the contract and the lowest bidder would get the contract. In a couple of years the contract would come up again and often one of the other guard services would bid less and get the contract.
What took place most of the time is the guard working for the one company would just quit and go to work for the other company that got the contract. So it would be new company and same guards.
The contract guards got higher pay because the government as part of the contract said that a certain percent of the money had to go to the officers.
The guard company would say that they gave their guards training but in fact they gave none. I know I worked for years for them as a second job on my days off from my full time job. I worked for Burns, Pinkerton, Well-Fargo and many others. I also owned stock in a couple of them and I would see their report to stockholders and they would show photos and stacks of books and videos that they said they gave to employees as training. It never happened. One company showed me a 15 minute slide show one time and that was it.
Continue reading "Federal Police Officers!!!! – Run… for your life.." »
Recent Comments